New Deal 2.0? Be careful there, Dems…

Posted on Wednesday 15 October 2008

Via TMV, from The Politico:

With visions of a massive liberal majority in the next Congress and the power to remake economic policy for the next generation, Democrats are dusting off their New Deal history books and openly discussing the idea of re-engineering Depression-era agencies for the 21st century.

If we do actually fall off the economy cliff, then sure… some of these ideas are probably worth pulling out of the moldering archives.   Something modeled on the Works Progress Administration (WPA) might make a lot of sense, both in terms of employment (if we end up with huge numbers of unemployed), and for our fast-decaying national infrastructure.

Contrary to all the panic and hoopla, however, we are NOT suffering conditions that resemble the Great Depression.  Why on earth would they be trotting any of this out right now?

Privately, Democrats are debating just how far they should go in discussing big ideas. One Senate Democratic aide warns that Hill Democrats should be careful not to “box Obama in” with too many big, unrealistic promises if he is elected. A House leadership aide says Democratic leaders are not taking a comprehensive look at New Deal agencies, but are studying what worked and what didn’t.

They need to be very, very careful here.

Not only does this play right into the narrative the GOP is trying to promote, it assumes a mandate I don’t think they’ll have.   The moderates and independents (and even many Republicans) who are helping the Democrats vote the Republicans out are not just footnotes to this year’s election.

Punishing one political party does not ipso facto embrace the most far-reaching ambitions of the other — not by a long shot.

And speaking of Franklin Delano Roosevelt…   for those of you who wondered what I was reacting to in last week’s debate?  It was rooted in another of his ideas — one that definitely needs to be left in the dusty historical archives.

2 Comments for 'New Deal 2.0? Be careful there, Dems…'

  1.  
    October 15, 2008 | 6:36 pm
     

    Generalissimo Roosevelt did a lot of apparently permanent damage to our nation. I guess we have to grudgingly thank him that we did not end up with total fascism, and total dictatorship, but how far were we really, with FOUR terms and a Supreme Court at least as cowed as the SCOTUS that served during the Lincoln administration?

    What would have transpired if Roosevelt had had another twenty years to live? Would he ever have been evicted from the oval office until his death?

  2.  
    C Stanley
    October 15, 2008 | 11:01 pm
     

    I hope that more undecideds will mull this over before going off the cliff with Obama and the Dem Congress.

    WPA type programs might well make sense for the reason you mention, Polimom- pairing the need for infrastructure repair and the need for job creation. Just do the program in a smart manner with oversight though…no Big Digs, please.

Comments on this blog are subject to the guidelines stated in the Comments Policy.
First-time comments are held for moderator approval. Please use a valid email address.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Please consider what you're posting.

Use the buttons below to customise your comment.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI