http://www.polimom.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-earmarks-and-alaskan-wealth/ I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line! Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:51:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 http://www.polimom.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-earmarks-and-alaskan-wealth/#comment-139168 Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:48:05 +0000 http://www.polimom.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-earmarks-and-alaskan-wealth/#comment-139168 NO ONE HAS QUESTIONED SARAH ABOUT EARMARKS UNTIL NOW. IF YOU ARE GOING TO INVESTIGATE HER, THEN INVESTIGATE ALL WHO USE EARMARKS. IT SEEM I HAVE READ THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH RECEIVING EARMARKS IF THEY ARE USED FOR SPECIFIED PROJECTS AND NOT TO HANDED OVER TO A SECOND PARTY.. ALSO, I LIKE IT WHEN PEOPLE LEARN ALONG THE WAY AND IF A PROJECT SEEMS UNDESIRABLE AT A LATER DATE GOOD FOR YOU IF YOU CHANGE YOUR STAND ON THAT PROJECT. NO ONE OBJECTED UNTIL NOW!! WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER SO OF COURSE I FEEL THAT OBAMA SHOULE BE GOING THROUGH THESE HOOPS ALSO. SINCERELY FRANCES HICKS NO ONE HAS QUESTIONED SARAH ABOUT EARMARKS UNTIL NOW. IF YOU ARE GOING TO INVESTIGATE HER, THEN INVESTIGATE ALL WHO USE EARMARKS. IT SEEM I HAVE READ THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH RECEIVING EARMARKS IF THEY ARE USED FOR SPECIFIED PROJECTS AND NOT TO HANDED OVER TO A SECOND PARTY.. ALSO, I LIKE IT WHEN PEOPLE LEARN ALONG THE WAY AND IF A PROJECT SEEMS UNDESIRABLE AT A LATER DATE GOOD FOR YOU IF YOU CHANGE YOUR STAND ON THAT PROJECT. NO ONE OBJECTED UNTIL NOW!! WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER SO OF COURSE I FEEL THAT OBAMA SHOULE BE GOING THROUGH THESE HOOPS ALSO. SINCERELY FRANCES HICKS

]]> http://www.polimom.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-earmarks-and-alaskan-wealth/#comment-138072 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:59:05 +0000 http://www.polimom.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-earmarks-and-alaskan-wealth/#comment-138072 [...] Even allowing for spin geared toward the target audience, her truth-stretching — about her own record, and also about Obama’s — put her in a very bad position. The bit about how she killed “The Bridge to Nowhere”, in particular, is quite a whopper, and claiming the high ground on earmarks was a real thigh-slapper. The MSM is going to eat her lunch with it. [...] […] Even allowing for spin geared toward the target audience, her truth-stretching — about her own record, and also about Obama’s — put her in a very bad position. The bit about how she killed “The Bridge to Nowhere”, in particular, is quite a whopper, and claiming the high ground on earmarks was a real thigh-slapper. The MSM is going to eat her lunch with it. […]

]]>