<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Churches, communities, flocks, and sheep</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pan_theFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-119102</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-119102</guid>
					<description>A friend of mine's father was always screaming hate messages which she and I disagreed with. I still went over there every day and hung out, was polite to him, and sometimes pointed out the flaws in the logic. Her father also taught me many things, including a lot about politics, and human nature.

Did I have to agree with every message he said to go to that house? Or could I just go there to see my friend, and form my own opinion of what the man said?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine&#8217;s father was always screaming hate messages which she and I disagreed with. I still went over there every day and hung out, was polite to him, and sometimes pointed out the flaws in the logic. Her father also taught me many things, including a lot about politics, and human nature.</p>
<p>Did I have to agree with every message he said to go to that house? Or could I just go there to see my friend, and form my own opinion of what the man said?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred Farkle</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118513</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118513</guid>
					<description>Your 'upstate church' analogy does not apply. 

If Obama's church had been his only choice in a tiny town in rural Illinois, then MAYBE your argument would hold water. But he had hundreds of choices open to him in Chicago, and yet he stuck with the America-hating black racists for twenty years. Not good enough for an American President. Not by a long shot. Not by a country mile. You are just making a lame excuse for a close association that's indefensible.

If the only church in my little town in Georgia, no bigger than yours, was a bunch of KKKers, I would refuse to go there. I would Bible-study at home.  

If any white candidate associated himself this way with a church of comparable views ...? Hahaha. Instant uproar, and end of story for that candidate. And you know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8216;upstate church&#8217; analogy does not apply. </p>
<p>If Obama&#8217;s church had been his only choice in a tiny town in rural Illinois, then MAYBE your argument would hold water. But he had hundreds of choices open to him in Chicago, and yet he stuck with the America-hating black racists for twenty years. Not good enough for an American President. Not by a long shot. Not by a country mile. You are just making a lame excuse for a close association that&#8217;s indefensible.</p>
<p>If the only church in my little town in Georgia, no bigger than yours, was a bunch of KKKers, I would refuse to go there. I would Bible-study at home.  </p>
<p>If any white candidate associated himself this way with a church of comparable views &#8230;? Hahaha. Instant uproar, and end of story for that candidate. And you know it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118470</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118470</guid>
					<description>*snort*

bello -- if it's out there, we're definitely going to hear about it -- all of it -- no matter what form "it" takes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*snort*</p>
<p>bello &#8212; if it&#8217;s out there, we&#8217;re definitely going to hear about it &#8212; all of it &#8212; no matter what form &#8220;it&#8221; takes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: belloscm</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118455</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 04:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118455</guid>
					<description>If only Obama had wagged his finger for emphasis, I would have totally believed him. 
Can't wait for the "blue dress" to show up, er, I mean, videotape of BOH doin' the call and response to some of Pastor Wright's hata-grams. And you know it's coming, don't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only Obama had wagged his finger for emphasis, I would have totally believed him.<br />
Can&#8217;t wait for the &#8220;blue dress&#8221; to show up, er, I mean, videotape of BOH doin&#8217; the call and response to some of Pastor Wright&#8217;s hata-grams. And you know it&#8217;s coming, don&#8217;t you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118431</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118431</guid>
					<description>I can't say I disagree with you there at all, CStanley.  And I haven't a clue whether there was a reluctance to address specific aspects of Wright's ministry, or if it was a larger campaign strategy.

I suspect it could be the latter, though, as easily as the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I disagree with you there at all, CStanley.  And I haven&#8217;t a clue whether there was a reluctance to address specific aspects of Wright&#8217;s ministry, or if it was a larger campaign strategy.</p>
<p>I suspect it could be the latter, though, as easily as the former.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118430</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118430</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tone deaf? Are you saying, then, that his response(s) yesterday weren’t loud enough? Or that they were off-key?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
At the risk of mixing my musical metaphors, in his response yesterday he was coming in quite a few beats too late. IOW, I think he's saying the right thing now- but if he hadn't been 'tone deaf' he would have anticipated that he needed to be more explicit about his points of disagreement with black liberation theology a long time ago. He seeemed to have felt that he could get by with the more general "I don't agree with some of what Rev. Wright says".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tone deaf? Are you saying, then, that his response(s) yesterday weren’t loud enough? Or that they were off-key?</p></blockquote>
<p>At the risk of mixing my musical metaphors, in his response yesterday he was coming in quite a few beats too late. IOW, I think he&#8217;s saying the right thing now- but if he hadn&#8217;t been &#8216;tone deaf&#8217; he would have anticipated that he needed to be more explicit about his points of disagreement with black liberation theology a long time ago. He seeemed to have felt that he could get by with the more general &#8220;I don&#8217;t agree with some of what Rev. Wright says&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118405</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118405</guid>
					<description>Maybe it is more on the lines of the response of the "Muslim leaders" &lt;em&gt;vis-a-vis&lt;/em&gt; condemning terrorism.  No matter how many times they speak out, no matter how strident their voices are, it will &lt;em&gt;never be enough &lt;/em&gt;for some.

Certainly Sen. Obama has addressed the issue to &lt;strong&gt;my&lt;/strong&gt; satisfaction.

(BTW, the ministers of the "large" churches (from 3,000 - &#62; 7,000 members) I have been a member of agree with you totally, as far as the "community thing" goes.  Which is why there is an increasing emphasis on "small groups" within the larger congregation.)

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is more on the lines of the response of the &#8220;Muslim leaders&#8221; <em>vis-a-vis</em> condemning terrorism.  No matter how many times they speak out, no matter how strident their voices are, it will <em>never be enough </em>for some.</p>
<p>Certainly Sen. Obama has addressed the issue to <strong>my</strong> satisfaction.</p>
<p>(BTW, the ministers of the &#8220;large&#8221; churches (from 3,000 - &gt; 7,000 members) I have been a member of agree with you totally, as far as the &#8220;community thing&#8221; goes.  Which is why there is an increasing emphasis on &#8220;small groups&#8221; within the larger congregation.)</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118395</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118395</guid>
					<description>Hi CStanley -- 

Tone deaf?  Are you saying, then, that his response(s) yesterday weren't loud enough?  Or that they were off-key?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CStanley &#8212; </p>
<p>Tone deaf?  Are you saying, then, that his response(s) yesterday weren&#8217;t loud enough?  Or that they were off-key?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118392</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/03/15/churches-communities-flocks-and-sheep/#comment-118392</guid>
					<description>I don't think that's hard to understand at all, and as an individual I'd completely agree that Obama could easily attend a church with his family even if he strongly disagreed with the politics being expressed there. As a presidential candidate though, particularly one who runs on a postracial, uniting platform, his tone deafness to how this type of political sermonizing affects people is a complete deal breaker, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s hard to understand at all, and as an individual I&#8217;d completely agree that Obama could easily attend a church with his family even if he strongly disagreed with the politics being expressed there. As a presidential candidate though, particularly one who runs on a postracial, uniting platform, his tone deafness to how this type of political sermonizing affects people is a complete deal breaker, IMO.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
