<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama support &#8212; but no Kool-aid</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115698</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115698</guid>
					<description>LOL!!!

er....  um...  thank you for your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!!!</p>
<p>er&#8230;.  um&#8230;  thank you for your thoughts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Enlighten Your Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115697</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115697</guid>
					<description>Cult Like Tendencies Noticed in Obama Voters
Feb 19, 2008 
It has been noted by many observant sociologist and psychologist that Obama's followers resemble cult like tendencies. 
In its truest form, they see their 'leader' more like a savior than a leader and brutally attack anyone who threatens their messenger. The reason lies deep within the subconscious mind but on the surface, the most obvious rationale: mirror of rejection on the self. By disagreeing with the message or messenger, in this case Obama and hope for his ability to bring about change, then it is perceived by that person as a direct threat that the 'change' the followers hope for is irrelevant or worse, not likely to occur. Also, on a deeper level, it really goes back to rejection...a rejection of the message or messenger equates to rejection for the follower.

So, as we consider the most important presidential debate of this century, one must logically ask if the zealous supporters of Obama are really voting with their intellect on the issues. The issues really are crucial in this most important historical event, such as who can best reverse this economy. 

Are the Obama supporters voting for an empty call to action based on deep subconscious levels rooted in low self esteem or even searching for internal peace from an external source? It must be considered by the superdelegates if need be to supercede the hype...

To the Obama voters, my recommendation would be for personal reflection on the emotions and then discover what is pulling you to vote for your next president. 

Hope in and of itself is a wonderful principle which keeps the human race on an encouraging evolutionary continuum. BUT, it is just that hope. It stops there. It is in fact a wimpy word which actually implies failure can occur. 

Knowing beforehand that making decisions based on anger, hope or basic evolutionary emotions does not lead to well thought, logical decisions.

Voting on a 17 point economical structure for the improvement for a near recession might be a more patriotic, intelligent decision and lead to a turning point for our economic future in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cult Like Tendencies Noticed in Obama Voters<br />
Feb 19, 2008<br />
It has been noted by many observant sociologist and psychologist that Obama&#8217;s followers resemble cult like tendencies.<br />
In its truest form, they see their &#8216;leader&#8217; more like a savior than a leader and brutally attack anyone who threatens their messenger. The reason lies deep within the subconscious mind but on the surface, the most obvious rationale: mirror of rejection on the self. By disagreeing with the message or messenger, in this case Obama and hope for his ability to bring about change, then it is perceived by that person as a direct threat that the &#8216;change&#8217; the followers hope for is irrelevant or worse, not likely to occur. Also, on a deeper level, it really goes back to rejection&#8230;a rejection of the message or messenger equates to rejection for the follower.</p>
<p>So, as we consider the most important presidential debate of this century, one must logically ask if the zealous supporters of Obama are really voting with their intellect on the issues. The issues really are crucial in this most important historical event, such as who can best reverse this economy. </p>
<p>Are the Obama supporters voting for an empty call to action based on deep subconscious levels rooted in low self esteem or even searching for internal peace from an external source? It must be considered by the superdelegates if need be to supercede the hype&#8230;</p>
<p>To the Obama voters, my recommendation would be for personal reflection on the emotions and then discover what is pulling you to vote for your next president. </p>
<p>Hope in and of itself is a wonderful principle which keeps the human race on an encouraging evolutionary continuum. BUT, it is just that hope. It stops there. It is in fact a wimpy word which actually implies failure can occur. </p>
<p>Knowing beforehand that making decisions based on anger, hope or basic evolutionary emotions does not lead to well thought, logical decisions.</p>
<p>Voting on a 17 point economical structure for the improvement for a near recession might be a more patriotic, intelligent decision and lead to a turning point for our economic future in America.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldenrod</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115008</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-115008</guid>
					<description>You'll find out soon enuf.  

You'll also discover that the more involved you get, the more time 'they' will want.  Getting actually involved in a political campaign can "eat you up one side &#38; spit you out the other" if you let it.

It's not at all like blogging.  You will become personally acquainted with a lot of other people, be expected to attend meetings, go down to campaign headquarters &#38; help stuff envelopes, etc.  You might also be inspired to set up a branch of the campaign in your area.

There's almost no end to how far you might end up traveling.  One thing, for sure, Polimom ... you'll lose your "Independent" status!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll find out soon enuf.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also discover that the more involved you get, the more time &#8216;they&#8217; will want.  Getting actually involved in a political campaign can &#8220;eat you up one side &amp; spit you out the other&#8221; if you let it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not at all like blogging.  You will become personally acquainted with a lot of other people, be expected to attend meetings, go down to campaign headquarters &amp; help stuff envelopes, etc.  You might also be inspired to set up a branch of the campaign in your area.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s almost no end to how far you might end up traveling.  One thing, for sure, Polimom &#8230; you&#8217;ll lose your &#8220;Independent&#8221; status!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114975</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114975</guid>
					<description>Hi Karen,

Not sure what goldenrod means by "a bunch of hours".  

However, my understanding is that a precinct captain &lt;em&gt;is &lt;/em&gt;the "grassroots" one hears about.  Talking to people (phone?  canvassing?  both?) about why one likes the candidate would, I expect, be a large part of things.  All in all, though, I'm pretty unsure also.

I have to say, though, that the mere fact that somebody like me (or you?) is considering participating for the first time at this level of the process speaks &lt;em&gt;volumes &lt;/em&gt; about the power of his campaign...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karen,</p>
<p>Not sure what goldenrod means by &#8220;a bunch of hours&#8221;.  </p>
<p>However, my understanding is that a precinct captain <em>is </em>the &#8220;grassroots&#8221; one hears about.  Talking to people (phone?  canvassing?  both?) about why one likes the candidate would, I expect, be a large part of things.  All in all, though, I&#8217;m pretty unsure also.</p>
<p>I have to say, though, that the mere fact that somebody like me (or you?) is considering participating for the first time at this level of the process speaks <em>volumes </em> about the power of his campaign&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Karen Hanks</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114973</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114973</guid>
					<description>So, what does a precinct captain do?  I got that e-mail too and was wondering if I should hit the button also.  And what do you mean by a bunch of hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what does a precinct captain do?  I got that e-mail too and was wondering if I should hit the button also.  And what do you mean by a bunch of hours?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goldenrod</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114962</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2008/02/13/obama-support-but-no-kool-aid/#comment-114962</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Go&lt;/strong&gt; for it!  Did the same thing myself (many times) years ago.  It'll give you a really good look at what goes on.  Be prepared to spend a bunch of hours, tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Go</strong> for it!  Did the same thing myself (many times) years ago.  It&#8217;ll give you a really good look at what goes on.  Be prepared to spend a bunch of hours, tho.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
