<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bees</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-69207</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-69207</guid>
					<description>Glenn --

I'm so glad you commented about your photo.  Not only was it a beautiful shot, but I'd never heard of Iguazu Falls before -- which means that your response sent me off on a brief online self-education.  Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn &#8211;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad you commented about your photo.  Not only was it a beautiful shot, but I&#8217;d never heard of Iguazu Falls before &#8212; which means that your response sent me off on a brief online self-education.  Thanks so much!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68917</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68917</guid>
					<description>The flower is of the same family, also a passion vine flower, but taken in Argentina; at Iguazu falls.

Ah, I forgot to mention my favorite - I like Bee2, for the contrast between the bee, the blue on the right, and the green on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flower is of the same family, also a passion vine flower, but taken in Argentina; at Iguazu falls.</p>
<p>Ah, I forgot to mention my favorite - I like Bee2, for the contrast between the bee, the blue on the right, and the green on the left.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68890</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68890</guid>
					<description>Hi Glenn,

The thumbnails here are resized, but the links are to crops from the originals.    And yes, I'm using the standard issue lens -- Nikkor 28-80mm.  It's not great for macros, or for telephotos either, for that matter.  But I promised myself I'd master (as much as possible) the standard lens before sinking the mega $$ into more lenses.

And what the heck is that flower you linked to?  Is that a passion vine, also?  Wild!    It doesn't look like mine at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Glenn,</p>
<p>The thumbnails here are resized, but the links are to crops from the originals.    And yes, I&#8217;m using the standard issue lens &#8212; Nikkor 28-80mm.  It&#8217;s not great for macros, or for telephotos either, for that matter.  But I promised myself I&#8217;d master (as much as possible) the standard lens before sinking the mega $$ into more lenses.</p>
<p>And what the heck is that flower you linked to?  Is that a passion vine, also?  Wild!    It doesn&#8217;t look like mine at all!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68886</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-68886</guid>
					<description>Just curious, are these crops of full size images (no resize)?  Are you using the "standard" kit lens?

I know what you mean about those passion flowers.  I took  
&lt;a href="http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/glennaa/Iguazu/flower.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;this photo&lt;/a&gt;  without realizing what kind of flower it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, are these crops of full size images (no resize)?  Are you using the &#8220;standard&#8221; kit lens?</p>
<p>I know what you mean about those passion flowers.  I took<br />
<a href="http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/glennaa/Iguazu/flower.jpg" rel="nofollow">this photo</a>  without realizing what kind of flower it was.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67978</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67978</guid>
					<description>Hunh.  Haven't started trying to fool around with layers yet.  I'll try it, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunh.  Haven&#8217;t started trying to fool around with layers yet.  I&#8217;ll try it, thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67964</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67964</guid>
					<description>Yes.  Simply post a comment on her blog entry titled &lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/commons/persona.html?newspaperUserId=bunnylady&#38;plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&#38;plckUserId=bunnylady&#38;plckPostId=Blog%3abunnyladyPost%3ac67716fc-9e7e-4d47-8c12-184bd9de5242&#38;plckController=PersonaBlog&#38;plckScript=personaScript&#38;plckElementId=personaDest" rel="nofollow"&gt;ADIP (A Day in Pictures)&lt;/a&gt; with a link back to the image.  The comment system there doesn't take user-written HTML I don't think, so you can just paste the URL in.

I thought you had sharpened #6 a bit.  The wings were OK, but I think you may have overdone it a bit on the stamens and pistils.  You might try it again on another copy of the original image (you don't tweak original images, do you?) and try selective sharpening using a duplicate layer.  Sharpen the top (duplicate) layer, set opacity to 100%, then "erase" the top layer to get the "selectively sharpened" effect.

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Simply post a comment on her blog entry titled <a href="http://www.chron.com/commons/persona.html?newspaperUserId=bunnylady&amp;plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckUserId=bunnylady&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3abunnyladyPost%3ac67716fc-9e7e-4d47-8c12-184bd9de5242&amp;plckController=PersonaBlog&amp;plckScript=personaScript&amp;plckElementId=personaDest" rel="nofollow">ADIP (A Day in Pictures)</a> with a link back to the image.  The comment system there doesn&#8217;t take user-written HTML I don&#8217;t think, so you can just paste the URL in.</p>
<p>I thought you had sharpened #6 a bit.  The wings were OK, but I think you may have overdone it a bit on the stamens and pistils.  You might try it again on another copy of the original image (you don&#8217;t tweak original images, do you?) and try selective sharpening using a duplicate layer.  Sharpen the top (duplicate) layer, set opacity to 100%, then &#8220;erase&#8221; the top layer to get the &#8220;selectively sharpened&#8221; effect.</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67914</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67914</guid>
					<description>Ed T - Thanks so much for the feedback!!! It feels like I'm getting better (and that I had a real breakthrough a day or two ago) -- but I really have hit the point now where I need other eyes and critique-ing.

Bee 6, btw, is my personal favorite. As you said, the stamen / pistils are in better focus, but it's because the bee shifted slightly when the shot fired. Shutter was at 1/640 sec, so he didn't go far, and he ended up looking transluscent -- except for the wings. I sharpened a tad to get the veins in them, btw.

I put a couple other shots over on the betterphoto gallery, also.  (&lt;a href="http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/free/gallery.asp?memberID=181041" rel="nofollow"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;)  Two of them are macros of a Passion Vine blossom. They are (imho) the most alien of the flowers in my garden. That gallery, btw, has a comments function; hopefully, you'll tell me if you see something I could improve (since nobody has said word one to me over there...)

Not sure what you mean, though, by "submit" to Stephanie.  You mean in a comment with a link to the (cropped) photo?

Thanks again, Ed!  Happy Easter to you, too.  Stay warm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed T - Thanks so much for the feedback!!! It feels like I&#8217;m getting better (and that I had a real breakthrough a day or two ago) &#8212; but I really have hit the point now where I need other eyes and critique-ing.</p>
<p>Bee 6, btw, is my personal favorite. As you said, the stamen / pistils are in better focus, but it&#8217;s because the bee shifted slightly when the shot fired. Shutter was at 1/640 sec, so he didn&#8217;t go far, and he ended up looking transluscent &#8212; except for the wings. I sharpened a tad to get the veins in them, btw.</p>
<p>I put a couple other shots over on the betterphoto gallery, also.  (<a href="http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/free/gallery.asp?memberID=181041" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  Two of them are macros of a Passion Vine blossom. They are (imho) the most alien of the flowers in my garden. That gallery, btw, has a comments function; hopefully, you&#8217;ll tell me if you see something I could improve (since nobody has said word one to me over there&#8230;)</p>
<p>Not sure what you mean, though, by &#8220;submit&#8221; to Stephanie.  You mean in a comment with a link to the (cropped) photo?</p>
<p>Thanks again, Ed!  Happy Easter to you, too.  Stay warm!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67901</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67901</guid>
					<description>Hint:  take Bee #7, crop in a rough circle centered on the bee and including the yellow area of the flower, and submit it to Steph Davis over at &lt;a href="http://commons.chron.com/bunnylady" rel="nofollow"&gt;Shutterblog&lt;/a&gt;,

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hint:  take Bee #7, crop in a rough circle centered on the bee and including the yellow area of the flower, and submit it to Steph Davis over at <a href="http://commons.chron.com/bunnylady" rel="nofollow">Shutterblog</a>,</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67897</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/04/06/bees/#comment-67897</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;EEK!  BEES!&lt;/strong&gt;

Just kidding... Really, you are getting pretty good with that new toy. I love the detail on the wing in #4, but I also like the overall composition in #2 and #7.  While #5 is OK, if you could have somehow stopped the wings (or at least slowed them down enough so that we could see wings) that would have been awesome.  On #6, it appears that the stamens/pistils of the flowers are more in focus than the bee is, which makes for an interesting scene (but not one I would have done.)

Don't know which one I like best -- but then if I had come across a bee, I wouldn't be getting near so up close and personal.

&lt;em&gt;Too bee, or not too bee...&lt;/em&gt;

Happy Easter,
~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EEK!  BEES!</strong></p>
<p>Just kidding&#8230; Really, you are getting pretty good with that new toy. I love the detail on the wing in #4, but I also like the overall composition in #2 and #7.  While #5 is OK, if you could have somehow stopped the wings (or at least slowed them down enough so that we could see wings) that would have been awesome.  On #6, it appears that the stamens/pistils of the flowers are more in focus than the bee is, which makes for an interesting scene (but not one I would have done.)</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know which one I like best &#8212; but then if I had come across a bee, I wouldn&#8217;t be getting near so up close and personal.</p>
<p><em>Too bee, or not too bee&#8230;</em></p>
<p>Happy Easter,<br />
~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
