<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newt&#8217;s shredded moral authority</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: myrtle</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-87357</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-87357</guid>
					<description>tsk! tsk! always the righter(wing =) have an excuse. the bible belt crowd are always espousing the for better or worse mantra. but do they practice it? evidntly not!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tsk! tsk! always the righter(wing =) have an excuse. the bible belt crowd are always espousing the for better or worse mantra. but do they practice it? evidntly not!!!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59738</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59738</guid>
					<description>This topic is too much fun!  As much as I disliked Clinton I never felt as though there was any basis behind the whole Republican/Ken Starr persecution agenda.  Yes, he lied.  But the question should never had been asked, would never have been asked if Republicans had possessed any sense of fair play.

Now for Newt Gingrich - whose Contract with America was the most honest, direct platform since, well, who knows?  Forever? - to be exposed as an utter hypocrite is hilarious.

It's also dangerously close to being vindication for the Clinton's many sins, of which lying about Bill's sexual foibles were the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic is too much fun!  As much as I disliked Clinton I never felt as though there was any basis behind the whole Republican/Ken Starr persecution agenda.  Yes, he lied.  But the question should never had been asked, would never have been asked if Republicans had possessed any sense of fair play.</p>
<p>Now for Newt Gingrich - whose Contract with America was the most honest, direct platform since, well, who knows?  Forever? - to be exposed as an utter hypocrite is hilarious.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also dangerously close to being vindication for the Clinton&#8217;s many sins, of which lying about Bill&#8217;s sexual foibles were the least.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59722</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59722</guid>
					<description>Interesting... that in many circles Clinton was given a pass because "no underlying crime had been committed" when he perjured himself, while 'Scooter' Libby was in fact convicted of the same offense (perjury), even though it turns out &lt;strong&gt;no underlying crime was committed&lt;/strong&gt;.

No, I am not making excuses for Newt's behavior.  In fact, I consider this pretty much the end of his road to the White House, as far as this voter is concerned.  Not because he had affair(s), but because he conveniently 'forgot' to mention this highly relevant fact during the time in question.  Sadly, that failure undoes much of the good that (IMHO) he did by bringing the whole notion of running on an actual platform, with planks consisting of those actions that would be taken in the event they were successful, to the American people.  Too bad the Dems couldn't have learned &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; lesson.

However, it also must be remembered that Clinton perjured himself in front of a judge in a case where he was the defendant, and he &lt;em&gt;used the office of the Presidency to give credence to his lie&lt;/em&gt;.  So, in fact there is a bit of a difference between Clinton and Newt.

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; that in many circles Clinton was given a pass because &#8220;no underlying crime had been committed&#8221; when he perjured himself, while &#8216;Scooter&#8217; Libby was in fact convicted of the same offense (perjury), even though it turns out <strong>no underlying crime was committed</strong>.</p>
<p>No, I am not making excuses for Newt&#8217;s behavior.  In fact, I consider this pretty much the end of his road to the White House, as far as this voter is concerned.  Not because he had affair(s), but because he conveniently &#8216;forgot&#8217; to mention this highly relevant fact during the time in question.  Sadly, that failure undoes much of the good that (IMHO) he did by bringing the whole notion of running on an actual platform, with planks consisting of those actions that would be taken in the event they were successful, to the American people.  Too bad the Dems couldn&#8217;t have learned <em>that</em> lesson.</p>
<p>However, it also must be remembered that Clinton perjured himself in front of a judge in a case where he was the defendant, and he <em>used the office of the Presidency to give credence to his lie</em>.  So, in fact there is a bit of a difference between Clinton and Newt.</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PoliBlog &#8482;: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts &#187; More Newtness</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59720</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59720</guid>
					<description>[...] Meanwhile, PoliMom has a good post on the subject, and I think reflects they way of lot of folks will react, and continue to react, to Newt and his role in the Clinton impeachment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Meanwhile, PoliMom has a good post on the subject, and I think reflects they way of lot of folks will react, and continue to react, to Newt and his role in the Clinton impeachment. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Heretik : Standard BS</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59719</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/03/09/newts-shredded-moral-authority/#comment-59719</guid>
					<description>[...] There are standards. And then there are standards. Then there is the standard BS. Standards really are for other people. Honestly. New Gingrich was in the middle of an extramarital affair when he was busy attacking Bill Clinton and his business with Monica Lewinsky. &#8220;The honest answer is yes,&#8221; Gingrich, a potential 2008 Republican presidential candidate, said in an interview with Focus on the Family founder James Dobson to be aired Friday, according to a transcript provided to The Associated Press. &#8220;There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. There&#8217;s certainly times when I&#8217;ve fallen short of God&#8217;s standards.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There are standards. And then there are standards. Then there is the standard BS. Standards really are for other people. Honestly. New Gingrich was in the middle of an extramarital affair when he was busy attacking Bill Clinton and his business with Monica Lewinsky. &#8220;The honest answer is yes,&#8221; Gingrich, a potential 2008 Republican presidential candidate, said in an interview with Focus on the Family founder James Dobson to be aired Friday, according to a transcript provided to The Associated Press. &#8220;There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. There&#8217;s certainly times when I&#8217;ve fallen short of God&#8217;s standards.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
