<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Very Bad Sign in Irbil</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53867</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53867</guid>
					<description>Agreed - that does seem to go against the stated policy of having the Iraqis run their own internal affairs.  However, it does sound just like the jurisdictional pissing contests the Feds &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; to engage in over here...

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed - that does seem to go against the stated policy of having the Iraqis run their own internal affairs.  However, it does sound just like the jurisdictional pissing contests the Feds <em>love</em> to engage in over here&#8230;</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53864</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53864</guid>
					<description>Ed -- 

I'm &lt;em&gt;far &lt;/em&gt;less concerned about the status of those offices than I am about the U.S. not working with the Kurdish authorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed &#8212; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m <em>far </em>less concerned about the status of those offices than I am about the U.S. not working with the Kurdish authorities.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53863</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2007/01/12/a-very-bad-sign-in-irbil/#comment-53863</guid>
					<description>While I am not exactly a fan of what happened, please read my comment on your previous post on this subject, follow and read the link, and back off the rhetoric-o-meter a notch or three!

Was this a good idea?  Almost certainly not.  Then, neither was bombing the Chinese Embassy in Serbia.  And, unlike the latter, entering a consulate is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; an act of war - as "consular premises" are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; considered the sovereign territory of the nation who occupies the space (again, unlike an embassy, which is.)

Also, it is common for a nation to use its embassy for intelligence-gathering (read:  spying):  its consulates, not so much (though there are lots of intel-type activities which don't involve espionage.)  OTOH, it is neither customary nor accepted practice to use an embassy/consulate as a staging point for armed insurrection against the host nation (this actually &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; be construed as an act of war), and if in fact the Iranians were using their offices for such a purpose, they may well be on very shaky ground.

And, as far as "friendly armies" engaging in rather tense stand-offs:  it isn't exactly unheard of (thinking about a particular NATO airfield in Italy some time ago), though again it would appear that someone really f'd up and didn't bother to do their homework.  One would &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt; think it was a matter of 'hot pursuit'... &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt;.
~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am not exactly a fan of what happened, please read my comment on your previous post on this subject, follow and read the link, and back off the rhetoric-o-meter a notch or three!</p>
<p>Was this a good idea?  Almost certainly not.  Then, neither was bombing the Chinese Embassy in Serbia.  And, unlike the latter, entering a consulate is <em>not</em> an act of war - as &#8220;consular premises&#8221; are <em>not</em> considered the sovereign territory of the nation who occupies the space (again, unlike an embassy, which is.)</p>
<p>Also, it is common for a nation to use its embassy for intelligence-gathering (read:  spying):  its consulates, not so much (though there are lots of intel-type activities which don&#8217;t involve espionage.)  OTOH, it is neither customary nor accepted practice to use an embassy/consulate as a staging point for armed insurrection against the host nation (this actually <em>could</em> be construed as an act of war), and if in fact the Iranians were using their offices for such a purpose, they may well be on very shaky ground.</p>
<p>And, as far as &#8220;friendly armies&#8221; engaging in rather tense stand-offs:  it isn&#8217;t exactly unheard of (thinking about a particular NATO airfield in Italy some time ago), though again it would appear that someone really f&#8217;d up and didn&#8217;t bother to do their homework.  One would <em>almost</em> think it was a matter of &#8216;hot pursuit&#8217;&#8230; <em>almost</em>.<br />
~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
