<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outing the gay witches</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom Says &#187; Obsessed with sex</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-41331</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-41331</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;m already on record with my disgust at this invasive, vicious campaign; nothing new to see here, really, for Polimom. I did find some amusement, though, in the reaction from some conservatives. Captain Ed, for instance, says: Once again, the Left shows its obsession with sexuality, but it&#8217;s really more than that. The Left obsesses over identity politics in all forms, and that obsession comes out in pathological terms. Rogers reveals this in his blog post, demanding that gay staffers on the Hill identify their orientation publicly, or else he will do it for them. Sexual identity is everything to him, and the concept of sexual privacy has no value to him at all. He wants to humiliate gays who prefer to keep their sexual activity private, forcing them to wear the virtual pink triangle against their will to experience obloquy and castigation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m already on record with my disgust at this invasive, vicious campaign; nothing new to see here, really, for Polimom. I did find some amusement, though, in the reaction from some conservatives. Captain Ed, for instance, says: Once again, the Left shows its obsession with sexuality, but it&#8217;s really more than that. The Left obsesses over identity politics in all forms, and that obsession comes out in pathological terms. Rogers reveals this in his blog post, demanding that gay staffers on the Hill identify their orientation publicly, or else he will do it for them. Sexual identity is everything to him, and the concept of sexual privacy has no value to him at all. He wants to humiliate gays who prefer to keep their sexual activity private, forcing them to wear the virtual pink triangle against their will to experience obloquy and castigation. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40810</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40810</guid>
					<description>Wow - a historical pun!  (as I recall, "faggot" was the name given to the pieces of flaming wood used to light the fires used to burn the witches and heretics.  The process they used to light the fire was by throwing the faggots onto the woodpile.)

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - a historical pun!  (as I recall, &#8220;faggot&#8221; was the name given to the pieces of flaming wood used to light the fires used to burn the witches and heretics.  The process they used to light the fire was by throwing the faggots onto the woodpile.)</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Folse</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40796</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40796</guid>
					<description>And the LCR exists to support issues inside the GOP. So, they didn't endorse W in the primaries and caucses? What apostasy! Toss the faggots on the pile  and set them alight. (Ok, if that's an offensive pun, I apologize, but I'm thinking about firewood a the temp drops into the 60s here in NOLA, and missing my Fargo fireplaces).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the LCR exists to support issues inside the GOP. So, they didn&#8217;t endorse W in the primaries and caucses? What apostasy! Toss the faggots on the pile  and set them alight. (Ok, if that&#8217;s an offensive pun, I apologize, but I&#8217;m thinking about firewood a the temp drops into the 60s here in NOLA, and missing my Fargo fireplaces).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40785</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40785</guid>
					<description>Remember - if the float, they're guilty; if they sink, they're innocent; and if the water inspired them to sing the theme from Titanic, they're gay Republicans!

All kidding aside, I wanted to take issue with the contention that HRC is a Democratic organization. They support candidates who are good on gay rights issues. That means they usually support Democrats for a simple reason: there just aren't nearly as many GOP candidates good on gay rights. 

So they get heat from gay Republicans for being "partisan" (please! guys, fix your party &#38; the endorsements will follow) and from Democrats when they do endorse a Republican (which they do on a regular basis).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember - if the float, they&#8217;re guilty; if they sink, they&#8217;re innocent; and if the water inspired them to sing the theme from Titanic, they&#8217;re gay Republicans!</p>
<p>All kidding aside, I wanted to take issue with the contention that HRC is a Democratic organization. They support candidates who are good on gay rights issues. That means they usually support Democrats for a simple reason: there just aren&#8217;t nearly as many GOP candidates good on gay rights. </p>
<p>So they get heat from gay Republicans for being &#8220;partisan&#8221; (please! guys, fix your party &amp; the endorsements will follow) and from Democrats when they do endorse a Republican (which they do on a regular basis).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Folse</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40782</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40782</guid>
					<description>Yeah, since WTIX and WWL moved to the FM band, I hardly ever fire up the AM button anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, since WTIX and WWL moved to the FM band, I hardly ever fire up the AM button anymore.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40780</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40780</guid>
					<description>It's all coming clear.  Wasn't Trandahl hiding in the grassy knoll?  Give me a break.  this guy has been working for congressional Republicans since the early 80s.

I would really like to know if his move from Clerk of the House of Representatives to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is part of the coverup as well.  He's not talking to reporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all coming clear.  Wasn&#8217;t Trandahl hiding in the grassy knoll?  Give me a break.  this guy has been working for congressional Republicans since the early 80s.</p>
<p>I would really like to know if his move from Clerk of the House of Representatives to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is part of the coverup as well.  He&#8217;s not talking to reporters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40778</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40778</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this how it all started for the Salem “witches”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Actually, if I recall that whole mess started when some children tried to cover up their naughty behavior by blaming it on adults.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course (as one hyperventilating defender of the Foley madness recently said), those 14- and 15-year-olds were probably just teenaged “beasts” who were merely trying to play a prank on that poor guy… “egging him on” and all that… (from &lt;a href="http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/10/one-for-the-dems-to-toss/" rel="nofollow"&gt;One for the Dems to toss&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
OK... bad example...

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this how it all started for the Salem “witches”?</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, if I recall that whole mess started when some children tried to cover up their naughty behavior by blaming it on adults.</p>
<blockquote><p>Of course (as one hyperventilating defender of the Foley madness recently said), those 14- and 15-year-olds were probably just teenaged “beasts” who were merely trying to play a prank on that poor guy… “egging him on” and all that… (from <a href="http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/10/one-for-the-dems-to-toss/" rel="nofollow">One for the Dems to toss</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>OK&#8230; bad example&#8230;</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed T.</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40776</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40776</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Polimom wonders what’s next. Perhaps trial by water? That was popular at one time, I hear…&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Alas, it is &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402005.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;no longer legal&lt;/a&gt;.

~EdT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Polimom wonders what’s next. Perhaps trial by water? That was popular at one time, I hear…</p></blockquote>
<p>Alas, it is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402005.html" rel="nofollow">no longer legal</a>.</p>
<p>~EdT.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40775</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40775</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;"...you need to listen to the AM band on your radio more often"&lt;/em&gt;

NOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;you need to listen to the AM band on your radio more often&#8221;</em></p>
<p>NOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooo
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Folse</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40774</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/10/13/outing-the-gay-witches/#comment-40774</guid>
					<description>My dear day, you need to listen to the AM band on your radio more often. You can't in fact be a loyal American, much less a Republican, under these conditions. The 20 million closeted black-shirts of Limbaugh land clearly consider people like myself to be Enemy Combatants, and would cheerfully load us onto the cattle cars and heard us into the camps.

We are much closer today to Weimar Germany that most people are willing to admit, because the prospect is so damned ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dear day, you need to listen to the AM band on your radio more often. You can&#8217;t in fact be a loyal American, much less a Republican, under these conditions. The 20 million closeted black-shirts of Limbaugh land clearly consider people like myself to be Enemy Combatants, and would cheerfully load us onto the cattle cars and heard us into the camps.</p>
<p>We are much closer today to Weimar Germany that most people are willing to admit, because the prospect is so damned ugly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
