<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to drive on, Louisiana</title>
	<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/02/01/time-to-drive-on-louisiana/</link>
	<description>I used to be in the middle, but they keep moving the line!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/02/01/time-to-drive-on-louisiana/#comment-725</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/02/01/time-to-drive-on-louisiana/#comment-725</guid>
					<description>I think LA should absolutely be pressing for the offshore royalty revenue.  It's kind of baffling how they ended up with such a small slice of the pie, compared with other states.

The time to fix that would absolutely be NOW.

OTOH, I'm not sure that a short-term tax /barrel is such a terrible idea - if only for a year or two, even.  

I agree that taxing corporations has negative impact the business climate.  But these are not normal times for Louisiana.  Furthermore, I didn't see Rodger's suggestion as wide-ranging (which would indeed dampen the entire economic atmosphere), but focused directly on the industries that are in large part WHY the coast and wetlands are in such sorry straights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think LA should absolutely be pressing for the offshore royalty revenue.  It&#8217;s kind of baffling how they ended up with such a small slice of the pie, compared with other states.</p>
<p>The time to fix that would absolutely be NOW.</p>
<p>OTOH, I&#8217;m not sure that a short-term tax /barrel is such a terrible idea - if only for a year or two, even.  </p>
<p>I agree that taxing corporations has negative impact the business climate.  But these are not normal times for Louisiana.  Furthermore, I didn&#8217;t see Rodger&#8217;s suggestion as wide-ranging (which would indeed dampen the entire economic atmosphere), but focused directly on the industries that are in large part WHY the coast and wetlands are in such sorry straights.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bayoustjohndavid</title>
		<link>http://www.polimom.com/2006/02/01/time-to-drive-on-louisiana/#comment-724</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.polimom.com/2006/02/01/time-to-drive-on-louisiana/#comment-724</guid>
					<description>I just made the comment on Rodger's blog that I think La.'s position is similar to that of a public sector union, in a contract dispute assets and leverage are good, public opinion is better.  Blanco's idea works because it can be used to point out the 3mi/14mi. difference between La.'s offshore limit and some other states'.  Unfortunately, I think the new tax idea would be using leverage about as well as PANO did in 1979.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just made the comment on Rodger&#8217;s blog that I think La.&#8217;s position is similar to that of a public sector union, in a contract dispute assets and leverage are good, public opinion is better.  Blanco&#8217;s idea works because it can be used to point out the 3mi/14mi. difference between La.&#8217;s offshore limit and some other states&#8217;.  Unfortunately, I think the new tax idea would be using leverage about as well as PANO did in 1979.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
